10 Pragmatic Ranking That Are Unexpected: Revision history

23 December 2024

• curprev 15:4815:48, 23 December 2024‎ MalissaQuimby8 talk contribs‎ m 9,363 bytes +131‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 14:3114:31, 23 December 2024‎ GenaBronson talk contribs‎ m 9,232 bytes −171‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 12:3712:37, 23 December 2024‎ MaximilianAskew talk contribs‎ m 9,403 bytes −89‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 02:4302:43, 23 December 2024‎ KatrinaBury4902 talk contribs‎ m 9,492 bytes −195‎ No edit summary undo

22 December 2024

• curprev 13:0113:01, 22 December 2024‎ MaxineEnos826 talk contribs‎ m 9,687 bytes +16‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 01:2001:20, 22 December 2024‎ JungGilbert97 talk contribs‎ m 9,671 bytes −72‎ No edit summary undo

21 December 2024

• curprev 19:1219:12, 21 December 2024‎ MohammedParry talk contribs‎ m 9,743 bytes +375‎ No edit summary undo

19 December 2024

• curprev 17:2817:28, 19 December 2024‎ 172.16.16.1 talk‎ 9,368 bytes −380‎ No edit summary undo

11 December 2024

• curprev 02:5502:55, 11 December 2024‎ GeniaHahn4 talk contribs‎ 9,748 bytes +9,748‎ Created page with "Pragmatic Ranking<br><br>To advance research on implementation and practice, it is important to establish measures that are both pragmatic and psychometrically valid. This study was designed to establish a pragmatic measurement criteria set by a stakeholder-led process. A systematic review of the literature and semi-structured stakeholder interviews provided 47 criteria for rating.<br><br>A list of the most influential authors in pragmatics was created based on citation..."