Why Pragmatic Ranking Is Your Next Big Obsession: Revision history

26 December 2024

• curprev 09:5709:57, 26 December 2024‎ AbbieTalbot13 talk contribs‎ m 9,475 bytes −31‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 07:2707:27, 26 December 2024‎ JorgJasso4195 talk contribs‎ m 9,506 bytes +35‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 00:2000:20, 26 December 2024‎ LesleyStelzer talk contribs‎ m 9,471 bytes −89‎ No edit summary undo

24 December 2024

• curprev 09:3209:32, 24 December 2024‎ ArronRehfisch52 talk contribs‎ m 9,560 bytes +29‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 03:0103:01, 24 December 2024‎ MckenzieNorris9 talk contribs‎ m 9,531 bytes −125‎ No edit summary undo

23 December 2024

• curprev 16:2216:22, 23 December 2024‎ KennethArchie29 talk contribs‎ m 9,656 bytes +62‎ No edit summary undo

21 December 2024

• curprev 19:3419:34, 21 December 2024‎ LorieFluharty talk contribs‎ m 9,594 bytes −49‎ No edit summary undo
• curprev 13:3513:35, 21 December 2024‎ RaymondBrisbane talk contribs‎ 9,643 bytes +9,643‎ Created page with "Pragmatic Ranking<br><br>To advance research into implementation and practice, it is essential to establish measures that are both pragmatic and psychometrically sound. This study was designed to establish a pragmatic measurement criteria set by a stakeholder-led process. A systematic review of the literature and semi-structured discussions with stakeholders produced 47 pragmatic rating categories.<br><br>A ranked list of the top authors of pragmatics was developed using..."