Created page with "What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is a study of the connection between language and context. It addresses issues such as what do people mean by the words they use?<br><br>It's a philosophy that is focused on practical and reasonable actions. It differs from idealism which is the idea that one should stick to their beliefs no matter what.<br><br>What is Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics examines the way that language users interact and communicate with each a..."
 
mNo edit summary
 
(12 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is a study of the connection between language and context. It addresses issues such as what do people mean by the words they use?<br><br>It's a philosophy that is focused on practical and reasonable actions. It differs from idealism which is the idea that one should stick to their beliefs no matter what.<br><br>What is Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics examines the way that language users interact and communicate with each and with each other. It is typically thought of as a component of language however, it differs from semantics in that pragmatics looks at what the user intends to convey, not what the meaning actually is.<br><br>As a field of research the field of pragmatics is still relatively new and its research has expanded rapidly in the last few decades. It is a linguistics academic field but it has also influenced research in other areas such as psychology, sociolinguistics, and Anthropology.<br><br>There are a myriad of approaches to pragmatics that have contributed to the development and growth of this field. One example is the Gricean approach to pragmatics, that focuses on the concept of intention and how it interacts with the speaker's knowledge of the listener's understanding. Other perspectives on pragmatics include the lexical and conceptual approaches to pragmatics. These perspectives have contributed to the variety of topics that researchers in pragmatics have studied.<br><br>The research in pragmatics has covered a vast range of subjects, including pragmatic understanding in L2 and request production by EFL students, as well as the importance of the theory of mind in physical and [https://artybookmarks.com/story18197126/10-meetups-about-pragmatic-site-you-should-attend 프라그마틱 무료체험 메타] mental metaphors. It can also be applied to various social and cultural phenomena, including political discourse, discriminatory language, and interpersonal communication. Researchers in pragmatics have used various methods from experimental to sociocultural.<br><br>The amount of knowledge base in pragmatics differs by database, as shown in Figure 9A-C. The US and the UK are among the top contributors to pragmatics research, yet their rankings differ by database. This difference is due to the fact that pragmatics is a multidisciplinary field that intersects with other disciplines.<br><br>It is therefore difficult to rank the top pragmatics authors according to the number of their publications. However, it is possible to determine the most influential authors by examining their contributions to pragmatics. Bambini for instance, has contributed to pragmatics by introducing concepts like politeness theories and conversational implicititure. Grice, Saul, and Kasper are also influential authors of pragmatics.<br><br>What is Free Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics focuses on the users and contexts of language use rather than focusing on reference to truth, grammar, or. It examines how a single phrase can be interpreted differently in different contexts. This includes ambiguity as well as indexicality. It also focuses primarily on the strategies employed by listeners to determine whether phrases have a message. It is closely linked to the theory of conversative implicature, which was pioneered by Paul Grice.<br><br>While the distinction between pragmatics and semantics is a well-known, long-established one, there is a lot of controversy regarding the exact boundaries of these disciplines. Some philosophers claim that the notion of meaning of sentences is a part of semantics, whereas other argue that this kind of issue should be viewed as pragmatic.<br><br>Another issue that has been a source of contention is whether the study of pragmatics should be regarded as an linguistics-related branch or as a component of philosophy of language. Some researchers have suggested that pragmatics is an independent discipline and should be considered a part of linguistics, along with the study of phonology. syntax, semantics, etc. Others, however, have suggested that the study of pragmatics should be viewed as part of the philosophy of language since it examines the ways in which our ideas about the meanings and functions of language affect our theories about how languages work.<br><br>The debate has been fuelled by a number of key issues that are central to the study of pragmatism. For instance, some scholars have claimed that pragmatics isn't a subject in its own right because it studies the ways that people interpret and use language without necessarily using any data about what actually gets said. This kind of approach is known as far-side pragmatics. Certain scholars have argued that this field should be considered as an academic discipline since it studies how cultural and social influences affect the meaning and use of language. This is known as near-side pragmatics.<br><br>Other topics of discussion in pragmatics include the way we perceive the nature of the utterance interpretation process as an inferential process, and the role that primary pragmatic processes play in the determining of what is being spoken by an individual speaker in a sentence. These are the issues more thoroughly discussed in the papers by Recanati and Bach. Both papers deal with the notions of saturation as well as free pragmatic enrichment. Both are important pragmatic processes in that they shape the meaning of an utterance.<br><br>What is the difference between free and explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics focuses on how the context affects the meaning of linguistics. It examines the way human language is used during social interaction as well as the relationship between speaker and interpreter. Pragmaticians are linguists who specialize on pragmatics.<br><br>Many different theories of pragmatics have been developed over the years. Some, like Gricean pragmatics, focus on the communication intention of the speaker. Relevance Theory, for example is a study of the processes of understanding that take place when listeners interpret the meaning of utterances. Some pragmatic approaches have been combined with other disciplines such as philosophy or cognitive science.<br><br>There are also a variety of views regarding the boundary between pragmatics and semantics. Morris is one philosopher who believes that semantics and pragmatism are two different subjects. He claims semantics concerns the relationship of signs to objects they may or may not refer to, whereas pragmatics is concerned with the use of words in the context.<br><br>Other philosophers like Bach and Harnish have suggested that pragmatism is an subfield of semantics. They distinguish between 'nearside and 'far-side' pragmatism. Near-side pragmatics focuses on the words spoken, while far-side pragmatics focuses on the logical consequences of saying something. They believe that semantics already determines some of the pragmatics of an expression, whereas other pragmatics is determined by pragmatic processes.<br><br>The context is one of the most important aspects of pragmatics. This means that the same phrase can mean different things in different contexts, depending on things like indexicality and ambiguity. Other things that can change the meaning of an utterance include discourse structure, [https://listfav.com/story19706984/why-nobody-cares-about-pragmatic-image 프라그마틱 사이트] [https://bookmarkcork.com/story18820212/4-dirty-little-details-about-pragmatic-korea-and-the-pragmatic-korea-industry 프라그마틱 슬롯 팁] 하는법 ([https://socialmphl.com/story20177937/what-not-to-do-during-the-pragmatic-free-slots-industry discover this info here]) speaker intentions and beliefs, and listener expectations.<br><br>A second aspect of pragmatics is its particularity in culture. It is because every culture has its own rules about what is appropriate in various situations. In certain cultures, it's considered polite to make eye contact. In other cultures, it's considered rude.<br><br>There are many different perspectives on pragmatics, and a lot of research is being conducted in this field. There are a myriad of areas of research, such as pragmatics that are computational and formal theoretic and experimental pragmatics, cross and intercultural linguistic pragmatics and pragmatics in the clinical and experimental sense.<br><br>What is the relationship between free Pragmatics and to explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>The discipline of pragmatics in linguistics is concerned with the way meaning is conveyed by language use in context. It is less concerned with the grammatical structure that is used in the speech and more on what the speaker is actually saying. Pragmaticians are linguists who focus on pragmatics. The subject of pragmatics is closely related to other areas of linguistics like syntax, semantics and the philosophy of language.<br><br>In recent years the field of pragmatics has evolved in a variety of directions. This includes computational linguistics and conversational pragmatics. These areas are characterized by a broad range of research, which addresses aspects like lexical features and the interplay between discourse, language, and meaning.<br><br>One of the major questions in the philosophical discussion of pragmatics is whether it is possible to provide an exhaustive, systematic view of the semantics/pragmatics interface. Some philosophers have argued that it's not (e.g. Morris 1938, Kaplan 1989). Other philosophers have suggested that the distinction between pragmatics and semantics is ill-defined and that pragmatics and semantics are in fact the identical.<br><br>The debate between these two positions is usually a tussle scholars argue that particular instances fall under the rubric of either pragmatics or semantics. Some scholars believe that if a statement has a literal truth conditional meaning, it's semantics. Others contend that the possibility that a statement may be read differently is a sign of pragmatics.<br><br>Other pragmatics researchers have taken a different view and argue that the truth-conditional meaning a utterance has is only one among many ways in which an utterance may be interpreted, and that all of these interpretations are valid. This approach is often referred to as far-side pragmatics.<br><br>Recent work in pragmatics has attempted to integrate semantic and far-side approaches trying to understand the full scope of the possibilities of an utterance's interpretation by modeling how a speaker's intentions and beliefs contribute to the interpretation. For example, Champollion et al. (2019) combine a Gricean game-theoretic model of the Rational Speech Act framework with technological innovations from Franke and Bergen (2020). The model predicts that listeners will be entertained by a variety of exhausted parses of a speech that is a part of the universal FCI Any, and that is why the exclusiveness implicature is so strong in comparison to other possible implications.
What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is a study of the connection between language and context. It addresses issues like: What do people mean by the words they use?<br><br>It's a philosophy that is focused on the practical and sensible actions. It's in opposition to idealism, the belief that you must always abide by your principles.<br><br>What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of ways in which language users get meaning from and with each one another. It is often viewed as a part of the language, although it differs from semantics because pragmatics examines what the user is trying to convey rather than what the meaning actually is.<br><br>As a research field it is comparatively new and its research has been growing rapidly over the past few decades. It is a language academic field, but it has also affected research in other areas such as psychology, sociolinguistics, and the field of anthropology.<br><br>There are a myriad of methods of pragmatics that have contributed to the development and growth of this field. For example, one perspective is the Gricean approach to pragmatics, which focuses on the notion of intention and how it interacts with the speaker's knowledge of the listener's understanding. Conceptual and lexical perspectives on pragmatics are also views on the topic. These perspectives have contributed to the diversity of subjects that researchers in pragmatics have studied.<br><br>The research in pragmatics has covered a broad variety of topics, including L2 pragmatic comprehension and request production by EFL students, as well as the importance of the theory of mind in physical and mental metaphors. It can also be applied to cultural and social phenomena, such as political discourse, discriminatory language and interpersonal communication. Pragmatics researchers have also employed various methods from experimental to sociocultural.<br><br>Figure 9A-C shows that the size of the knowledge base on pragmatics is different depending on which database is used. The US and the UK are among the top researchers in pragmatics research, but their positions differ based on the database. This is because pragmatics is a multidisciplinary area that intersects other disciplines.<br><br>It is therefore difficult to rank the best pragmatics authors solely based on the number of publications they have published. It is possible to identify influential authors by looking at their contributions to the field of pragmatics. Bambini is one example. He has contributed to pragmatics through concepts like conversational implicititure and politeness theories. Other authors who have been influential in the field of pragmatics are Grice, Saul and Kasper.<br><br>What is Free Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics is more concerned with the contexts and the users of language than it is with truth grammar, reference, or. It examines how a single utterance may be understood differently in different contexts. This includes ambiguity and indexicality. It also focuses on the strategies used by listeners to determine if phrases have a message. It is closely connected to the theory of conversative implicature which was first developed by Paul Grice.<br><br>While the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is a well-known, [https://www.google.co.ls/url?q=https://writeablog.net/scarfsofa0/pragmatic-free-trial-tips-from-the-most-effective-in-the-industry 프라그마틱 게임] 정품확인 ([https://firsturl.de/oS2cyCb click through the following website]) long-established one however, there is much debate about the precise boundaries of these fields. For instance philosophers have suggested that the concept of sentence's meaning is a part of semantics while others have argued that this type of thing should be considered as a pragmatic issue.<br><br>Another issue is whether pragmatics is a branch of philosophy of language or a branch of the study of linguistics. Some researchers have argued that pragmatics is a subject in its own right and should be considered a distinct part of the field of linguistics along with syntax, phonology, semantics, etc. Others, however, have claimed that the study of pragmatics should be viewed as an aspect of philosophy of language because it focuses on the ways in which our ideas about the meaning and uses of language affect our theories of how languages function.<br><br>This debate has been fueled by a few key questions that are essential to the study of pragmatics. For example, some scholars have claimed that pragmatics isn't a discipline in and of itself because it studies the ways in which people interpret and use language without using any data about what actually gets said. This sort of approach is referred to as far-side pragmatics. Certain scholars have argued that this research should be considered as an independent discipline because it examines how cultural and social influences affect the meaning and use language. This is known as near-side pragmatics.<br><br>Other topics of discussion in pragmatics are the ways we think about the nature of the utterance interpretation process as an inferential process and the importance that primary pragmatic processes play in the determining of what is being said by the speaker in a particular sentence. Recanati and Bach discuss these topics in more depth. Both papers address the notions of the concept of saturation and free pragmatic enrichment. These are significant pragmatic processes that help shape the overall meaning an utterance.<br><br>What is the difference between explanatory and free Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics is how the context affects the meaning of linguistics. It examines how language is used in social interaction, and the relationship between the interpreter and the speaker. Pragmaticians are linguists who specialize in pragmatics.<br><br>Over the years, many theories of pragmatism have been developed. Some, such as Gricean pragmatics, concentrate on the communication intention of a speaker. Relevance Theory for instance is focused on the processes of understanding that take place when listeners interpret the meaning of utterances. Some pragmatics theories have been merged with other disciplines, including cognitive science and philosophy.<br><br>There are also a variety of views regarding the boundary between semantics and pragmatics. Some philosophers, like Morris, believe that semantics and pragmatics are two distinct topics. He says that semantics deal with the relation of words to objects that they could or may not denote, whereas pragmatics deals with the use of words in context.<br><br>Other philosophers like Bach and Harnish have suggested that pragmatism is an subfield of semantics. They define "near-side" and "far-side" pragmatics. Near-side pragmatics concerns what is said while far-side focuses on the logic implications of uttering a phrase. They claim that some of the 'pragmatics' of an utterance is already influenced by semantics, while other 'pragmatics' is defined by the processes of inference.<br><br>The context is among the most important aspects in pragmatics. This means that the same utterance can mean different things in different contexts, based on factors such as indexicality and ambiguity. Other elements that can alter the meaning of an utterance include the structure of the discourse, speaker intentions and beliefs, as well as expectations of the listener.<br><br>Another aspect of pragmatics is its cultural specificity. It is because every culture has its own rules about what is appropriate in various situations. For instance, it is polite in some cultures to make eye contact while it is rude in other cultures.<br><br>There are a variety of views of pragmatics, and a great deal of research is conducted in this field. There are a variety of areas of study,  [https://writeablog.net/foldwater0/why-we-are-in-love-with-slot-and-you-should-also 프라그마틱 슬롯무료] including pragmatics that are computational and formal theoretic and experimental pragmatism, intercultural and cross pragmatics in linguistics, and pragmatics in the clinical and experimental sense.<br><br>How does Free Pragmatics compare to Explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>The discipline of pragmatics, a linguistic field, is concerned with the way meaning is conveyed through the use of language in a context. It examines the way in which the speaker's intentions and beliefs contribute to interpretation, with less attention paid to the grammatical aspects of the speech rather than what is said. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are called pragmaticians. The subject of pragmatics has a link to other areas of the study of linguistics, such as semantics and syntax or  [https://firsturl.de/maBU9rx 프라그마틱 플레이] philosophy of language.<br><br>In recent years the area of pragmatics has been developing in several different directions, including computational linguistics, pragmatics in conversation, and theoretical pragmatics. There is a wide range of research conducted in these areas, addressing topics such as the role of lexical elements and the interaction between discourse and  [https://images.google.com.gt/url?q=https://telegra.ph/11-Creative-Ways-To-Write-About-Pragmatic-Slots-Free-Trial-09-18 프라그마틱 슬롯 조작] 플레이 ([https://maps.google.ae/url?q=https://blogfreely.net/coachlawyer9/14-businesses-are-doing-a-fantastic-job-at-free-slot-pragmatic https://maps.Google.ae]) language and the nature of meaning itself.<br><br>In the philosophical debate about pragmatism one of the most important questions is whether it's possible to provide a thorough and systematic explanation of the interface between semantics and pragmatics. Some philosophers have claimed that it is not (e.g. Morris 1938, Kaplan 1989). Other philosophers have argued the distinction between semantics and pragmatics isn't well-defined, and that they are the same.<br><br>The debate over these positions is usually a back and forth affair and scholars arguing that certain phenomena fall under the rubric of either semantics or pragmatics. For example certain scholars argue that if an expression has an actual truth-conditional meaning, then it is semantics. On the other hand, others believe that the fact that a statement may be interpreted in various ways is a sign of pragmatics.<br><br>Other pragmatics researchers have taken an alternative route. They claim that the truth-conditional interpretation of a sentence is only one of many possible interpretations and that all of them are valid. This is commonly referred to as far-side pragmatics.<br><br>Recent research in pragmatics has tried to combine both approaches in an effort to comprehend the full scope of the interpretive possibilities for an utterance by modeling how a speaker's intentions and beliefs affect the interpretation. For example, Champollion et al. (2019) combine the Gricean game theory model of the Rational Speech Act framework with technological advances from Franke and Bergen (2020). The model predicts that listeners will be entertained by a variety of exhausted parses of an speech that is a part of the universal FCI Any, and that is why the exclusiveness implicature is so strong when compared to other plausible implications.

Latest revision as of 23:50, 23 December 2024

What is Pragmatics?

Pragmatics is a study of the connection between language and context. It addresses issues like: What do people mean by the words they use?

It's a philosophy that is focused on the practical and sensible actions. It's in opposition to idealism, the belief that you must always abide by your principles.

What is Pragmatics?

Pragmatics is the study of ways in which language users get meaning from and with each one another. It is often viewed as a part of the language, although it differs from semantics because pragmatics examines what the user is trying to convey rather than what the meaning actually is.

As a research field it is comparatively new and its research has been growing rapidly over the past few decades. It is a language academic field, but it has also affected research in other areas such as psychology, sociolinguistics, and the field of anthropology.

There are a myriad of methods of pragmatics that have contributed to the development and growth of this field. For example, one perspective is the Gricean approach to pragmatics, which focuses on the notion of intention and how it interacts with the speaker's knowledge of the listener's understanding. Conceptual and lexical perspectives on pragmatics are also views on the topic. These perspectives have contributed to the diversity of subjects that researchers in pragmatics have studied.

The research in pragmatics has covered a broad variety of topics, including L2 pragmatic comprehension and request production by EFL students, as well as the importance of the theory of mind in physical and mental metaphors. It can also be applied to cultural and social phenomena, such as political discourse, discriminatory language and interpersonal communication. Pragmatics researchers have also employed various methods from experimental to sociocultural.

Figure 9A-C shows that the size of the knowledge base on pragmatics is different depending on which database is used. The US and the UK are among the top researchers in pragmatics research, but their positions differ based on the database. This is because pragmatics is a multidisciplinary area that intersects other disciplines.

It is therefore difficult to rank the best pragmatics authors solely based on the number of publications they have published. It is possible to identify influential authors by looking at their contributions to the field of pragmatics. Bambini is one example. He has contributed to pragmatics through concepts like conversational implicititure and politeness theories. Other authors who have been influential in the field of pragmatics are Grice, Saul and Kasper.

What is Free Pragmatics?

The study of pragmatics is more concerned with the contexts and the users of language than it is with truth grammar, reference, or. It examines how a single utterance may be understood differently in different contexts. This includes ambiguity and indexicality. It also focuses on the strategies used by listeners to determine if phrases have a message. It is closely connected to the theory of conversative implicature which was first developed by Paul Grice.

While the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is a well-known, 프라그마틱 게임 정품확인 (click through the following website) long-established one however, there is much debate about the precise boundaries of these fields. For instance philosophers have suggested that the concept of sentence's meaning is a part of semantics while others have argued that this type of thing should be considered as a pragmatic issue.

Another issue is whether pragmatics is a branch of philosophy of language or a branch of the study of linguistics. Some researchers have argued that pragmatics is a subject in its own right and should be considered a distinct part of the field of linguistics along with syntax, phonology, semantics, etc. Others, however, have claimed that the study of pragmatics should be viewed as an aspect of philosophy of language because it focuses on the ways in which our ideas about the meaning and uses of language affect our theories of how languages function.

This debate has been fueled by a few key questions that are essential to the study of pragmatics. For example, some scholars have claimed that pragmatics isn't a discipline in and of itself because it studies the ways in which people interpret and use language without using any data about what actually gets said. This sort of approach is referred to as far-side pragmatics. Certain scholars have argued that this research should be considered as an independent discipline because it examines how cultural and social influences affect the meaning and use language. This is known as near-side pragmatics.

Other topics of discussion in pragmatics are the ways we think about the nature of the utterance interpretation process as an inferential process and the importance that primary pragmatic processes play in the determining of what is being said by the speaker in a particular sentence. Recanati and Bach discuss these topics in more depth. Both papers address the notions of the concept of saturation and free pragmatic enrichment. These are significant pragmatic processes that help shape the overall meaning an utterance.

What is the difference between explanatory and free Pragmatics?

The study of pragmatics is how the context affects the meaning of linguistics. It examines how language is used in social interaction, and the relationship between the interpreter and the speaker. Pragmaticians are linguists who specialize in pragmatics.

Over the years, many theories of pragmatism have been developed. Some, such as Gricean pragmatics, concentrate on the communication intention of a speaker. Relevance Theory for instance is focused on the processes of understanding that take place when listeners interpret the meaning of utterances. Some pragmatics theories have been merged with other disciplines, including cognitive science and philosophy.

There are also a variety of views regarding the boundary between semantics and pragmatics. Some philosophers, like Morris, believe that semantics and pragmatics are two distinct topics. He says that semantics deal with the relation of words to objects that they could or may not denote, whereas pragmatics deals with the use of words in context.

Other philosophers like Bach and Harnish have suggested that pragmatism is an subfield of semantics. They define "near-side" and "far-side" pragmatics. Near-side pragmatics concerns what is said while far-side focuses on the logic implications of uttering a phrase. They claim that some of the 'pragmatics' of an utterance is already influenced by semantics, while other 'pragmatics' is defined by the processes of inference.

The context is among the most important aspects in pragmatics. This means that the same utterance can mean different things in different contexts, based on factors such as indexicality and ambiguity. Other elements that can alter the meaning of an utterance include the structure of the discourse, speaker intentions and beliefs, as well as expectations of the listener.

Another aspect of pragmatics is its cultural specificity. It is because every culture has its own rules about what is appropriate in various situations. For instance, it is polite in some cultures to make eye contact while it is rude in other cultures.

There are a variety of views of pragmatics, and a great deal of research is conducted in this field. There are a variety of areas of study, 프라그마틱 슬롯무료 including pragmatics that are computational and formal theoretic and experimental pragmatism, intercultural and cross pragmatics in linguistics, and pragmatics in the clinical and experimental sense.

How does Free Pragmatics compare to Explanatory Pragmatics?

The discipline of pragmatics, a linguistic field, is concerned with the way meaning is conveyed through the use of language in a context. It examines the way in which the speaker's intentions and beliefs contribute to interpretation, with less attention paid to the grammatical aspects of the speech rather than what is said. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are called pragmaticians. The subject of pragmatics has a link to other areas of the study of linguistics, such as semantics and syntax or 프라그마틱 플레이 philosophy of language.

In recent years the area of pragmatics has been developing in several different directions, including computational linguistics, pragmatics in conversation, and theoretical pragmatics. There is a wide range of research conducted in these areas, addressing topics such as the role of lexical elements and the interaction between discourse and 프라그마틱 슬롯 조작 플레이 (https://maps.Google.ae) language and the nature of meaning itself.

In the philosophical debate about pragmatism one of the most important questions is whether it's possible to provide a thorough and systematic explanation of the interface between semantics and pragmatics. Some philosophers have claimed that it is not (e.g. Morris 1938, Kaplan 1989). Other philosophers have argued the distinction between semantics and pragmatics isn't well-defined, and that they are the same.

The debate over these positions is usually a back and forth affair and scholars arguing that certain phenomena fall under the rubric of either semantics or pragmatics. For example certain scholars argue that if an expression has an actual truth-conditional meaning, then it is semantics. On the other hand, others believe that the fact that a statement may be interpreted in various ways is a sign of pragmatics.

Other pragmatics researchers have taken an alternative route. They claim that the truth-conditional interpretation of a sentence is only one of many possible interpretations and that all of them are valid. This is commonly referred to as far-side pragmatics.

Recent research in pragmatics has tried to combine both approaches in an effort to comprehend the full scope of the interpretive possibilities for an utterance by modeling how a speaker's intentions and beliefs affect the interpretation. For example, Champollion et al. (2019) combine the Gricean game theory model of the Rational Speech Act framework with technological advances from Franke and Bergen (2020). The model predicts that listeners will be entertained by a variety of exhausted parses of an speech that is a part of the universal FCI Any, and that is why the exclusiveness implicature is so strong when compared to other plausible implications.