Created page with "What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between language, context and meaning. It addresses questions like: What do people mean by the words they use?<br><br>It's a way of thinking that focuses on practical and reasonable actions. It is in contrast to idealism, which is the belief that one must adhere to their beliefs no matter what.<br><br>What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of the ways that language users find meaning from..."
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of the relationship between language, context and meaning. It addresses questions like: What do people mean by the words they use?<br><br>It's a way of thinking that focuses on practical and reasonable actions. It is in contrast to idealism, which is the belief that one must adhere to their beliefs no matter what.<br><br>What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of the ways that language users find meaning from and each with each other. It is typically thought of as a component of language, although it differs from semantics because pragmatics examines what the user wants to convey rather than what the actual meaning is.<br><br>As a research area the field of pragmatics is relatively new and its research has been expanding rapidly in the last few decades. It is primarily an academic field of study within linguistics, however it also has an impact on research in other fields like psychology, speech-language pathology, sociolinguistics, and Anthropology.<br><br>There are a variety of perspectives on pragmatics, which have contributed to its growth and development. One is the Gricean pragmatics approach, which focuses primarily on the notions of intention and the interaction with the speaker's knowledge about the listener's understanding. Conceptual and lexical approaches to pragmatics are also perspectives on the subject. These perspectives have contributed to the wide range of subjects that researchers studying pragmatics have studied.<br><br>The research in pragmatics has covered a vast variety of topics, including pragmatic understanding in L2 and request production by EFL students, and the role of the theory of mind in mental and physical metaphors. It can also be applied to cultural and [https://www.google.co.uz/url?q=https://anotepad.com/notes/2hgwp7rj 프라그마틱 슬롯 체험] social phenomena, such as political discourse, discriminatory language, and interpersonal communication. Pragmatics researchers have also employed diverse methodologies, from experimental to sociocultural.<br><br>The size of the knowledge base in pragmatics varies by database, as shown in Figure 9A-C. The US and UK are two of the top performers in the field of pragmatics research. However, their rank differs based on the database. This is due to the fact that pragmatics is a multidisciplinary field that intersects with other disciplines.<br><br>This makes it difficult to rank the top pragmatics authors by the number of publications they have. However, it is possible to determine the most influential authors by looking at their contributions to pragmatics. Bambini, for example, has contributed to pragmatics with concepts such as conversational implicititure and politeness theories. Grice, Saul, and Kasper are the most influential authors of pragmatics.<br><br>What is Free Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics is more concerned with the contexts and users of language than it is with truth or reference, or grammar. It studies the ways in which one expression can be understood to mean various things depending on the context and also those caused by ambiguity or indexicality. It also focuses on the strategies used by listeners to determine whether utterances have a communicative intent. It is closely related to the theory of conversative implicature which was first developed by Paul Grice.<br><br>While the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is a well-known, long-established one, there is a lot of controversy about the precise boundaries of these disciplines. For instance, some philosophers have argued that the notion of a sentence meaning is an aspect of semantics. Others have argued that this type of thing should be treated as a pragmatic problem.<br><br>Another controversy concerns whether pragmatics is a part of philosophy of language or a part of the study of linguistics. Some researchers have suggested that pragmatics is a field in its own right and that it should be considered a distinct part of linguistics alongside phonology, syntax semantics and more. Others have suggested the study of pragmatics is an aspect of philosophy since it focuses on how our ideas about the meaning of language and how it is used influence our theories of how languages function.<br><br>There are a few key issues in the study of pragmatics that have been the source of much of this debate. For instance, some researchers have suggested that pragmatics isn't a subject in its own right because it studies the ways in which people interpret and use language, without being able to provide any information regarding what is actually being said. This kind of method is known as far-side pragmatics. Other scholars, however, have argued that this study is a discipline in its own right because it examines the manner the meaning and usage of language is affected by cultural and social factors. This is called near-side pragmatics.<br><br>The pragmatics field also discusses the inferential nature of utterances and the role of primary pragmatic processes in determining the meaning of what a speaker is expressing in the sentence. Recanati and Bach discuss these issues in more detail. Both papers address the notions of saturation as well as free pragmatic enrichment, which are crucial pragmatic processes in the sense that they aid in shaping the meaning of an utterance.<br><br>How is Free Pragmatics Different from Explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics focuses on how the context affects the meaning of linguistics. It focuses on how humans use language in social interaction as well as the relationship between speaker and interpreter. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are called pragmaticians.<br><br>Over the years, a variety of theories of pragmatism have been proposed. Some, like Gricean pragmatics, focus on the intention of communication of a speaker. Relevance Theory, for example, focuses on the processes of understanding that take place when listeners interpret the meaning of utterances. Some pragmatics theories have been combined with other disciplines, such as philosophy and cognitive science.<br><br>There are also different views regarding the boundary between pragmatics and semantics. Some philosophers, like Morris believes that pragmatics and semantics are two separate topics. He argues that semantics is concerned with the relationship between signs and objects that they might or may not refer to, whereas pragmatics is concerned with the use of words in context.<br><br>Other philosophers, including Bach and Harnish have suggested that pragmatics is a subfield within semantics. They distinguish between 'near-side' and 'far-side' pragmatics. Near-side pragmatics is focused on what is said, whereas far-side pragmatics concentrates on the logical consequences of saying something. They argue that semantics is already determining the logical implications of an utterance, while other pragmatics are determined by the pragmatic processes.<br><br>The context is among the most important aspects in pragmatics. This means that a single word may have different meanings depending on factors such as indexicality or ambiguity. Discourse structure, speaker beliefs and intentions, and  [http://gdchuanxin.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=4145412 프라그마틱 슬롯체험] expectations of the listener can alter the meaning of a word.<br><br>Another aspect of pragmatics is that it is culturally specific. This is because each culture has its own rules for what is acceptable in various situations. In certain cultures, it's polite to look at each other. In other cultures, it's considered rude.<br><br>There are many different perspectives on pragmatics and much research is being conducted in this area. There are a variety of areas of research, such as formal and computational pragmatics as well as experimental and theoretical pragmatics, cross and intercultural pragmatics of language, as well as clinical and experimentative pragmatics.<br><br>How is free Pragmatics similar to Explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>The discipline of pragmatics is concerned with how meaning is communicated through the language used in its context. It evaluates how the speaker's intentions and beliefs affect the interpretation, with less attention paid to grammatical features of the utterance than on what is said. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are called pragmaticians. The subject of pragmatics is related to other areas of linguistics, like syntax, semantics and the philosophy of language.<br><br>In recent years the area of pragmatics has been developing in a variety of directions such as computational linguistics pragmatics of conversation, and theoretic pragmatics. These areas are characterized by a wide variety of research, which addresses issues like lexical characteristics and the interplay between discourse, language, and meaning.<br><br>In the philosophical debate about pragmatics, one of the major questions is whether it is possible to give a rigorous and systematic analysis of the relationship between pragmatics and semantics. Some philosophers have argued it isn't (e.g. Morris 1938, Kaplan 1989). Other philosophers have claimed that the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is not clear and that semantics and pragmatics are in fact the identical.<br><br>The debate over these positions is usually an ongoing debate and scholars arguing that particular phenomena fall under the umbrella of either semantics or [https://peatix.com/user/23940951 프라그마틱 슬롯무료] 정품인증 ([http://tawassol.univ-tebessa.dz/index.php?qa=user&qa_1=beardspot4 read]) pragmatics. For example some scholars believe that if an expression has a literal truth-conditional meaning then it is semantics, whereas others believe that the fact that an expression can be interpreted in a variety of ways is pragmatics.<br><br>Other researchers in the field of pragmatics have taken a different approach and argue that the truth-conditional meaning of an expression is only one of many ways that the word can be interpreted and that all of these interpretations are valid. This is commonly referred to as far-side pragmatics.<br><br>Some recent work in pragmatics has attempted to combine semantic and far-side approaches, attempting to capture the full scope of the possibilities for  [https://wuchangtongcheng.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=207647 프라그마틱 체험] interpretation of a utterance by modeling how a speaker's beliefs and intentions influence the interpretation. For example, Champollion et al. The 2019 version is an Gricean model of the Rational Speech Act framework, and technological advances developed by Franke and  [https://postheaven.net/blackgum2/the-top-pragmatic-slot-experience-is-gurus 프라그마틱 슬롯 무료체험] Bergen. This model predicts listeners will entertain many possible exhausted parses of an speech utterance that includes the universal FCI Any, and this is why the exclusiveness implicature is so robust in comparison to other possible implications.
What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of the connection between context, language and meaning. It asks questions like: What do people really think when they use words?<br><br>It's a philosophy of practical and reasonable actions. It's in opposition to idealism, which is the belief that you must always abide by your principles.<br><br>What is Pragmatics?<br><br>Pragmatics is the study of the ways in which language users gain meaning from and each with each other. It is often thought of as a part or language, however it differs from semantics in that it concentrates on what the user is trying to convey and not on what the actual meaning is.<br><br>As a research field, pragmatics is relatively young and its research has grown rapidly in the last few decades. It is a linguistics-related academic field however, it has also influenced research in other areas like sociolinguistics, psychology and Anthropology.<br><br>There are many different perspectives on pragmatics, which have contributed to its development and growth. One is the Gricean pragmatics approach, which is based primarily on the notions of intention and their interaction with the speaker's knowledge of the listener's comprehension. The lexical and concept perspectives on pragmatics are likewise perspectives on the subject. These perspectives have contributed to the wide range of subjects that researchers studying pragmatics have studied.<br><br>The research in pragmatics has been focused on a variety of topics, including L2 pragmatic comprehension, production of requests by EFL learners and the role of theory of mind in physical and mental metaphors. It is also applied to social and cultural phenomena, including political discourse, discriminatory language and interpersonal communication. Pragmatics researchers have also used diverse methodologies that range from experimental to sociocultural.<br><br>Figure 9A-C illustrates that the size of the knowledge base on pragmatics is different depending on the database used. The US and 슬롯 [[https://olderworkers.com.au/author/iaheb18yc47mt-sarahconner-co-uk/ please click the next web page]] UK are two of the top producers in pragmatics research. However, their ranking differs based on the database. This difference is due to the fact that pragmatics is a multidisciplinary field that intersects with other disciplines.<br><br>This makes it difficult to rank the top authors in pragmatics according to the number of publications they have. It is possible to determine influential authors by looking at their contributions to the field of pragmatics. For example Bambini's contribution in pragmatics includes pioneering concepts such as conversational implicature, and politeness theory. Grice, Saul, and 프라그마틱 공식홈페이지, [https://digitaltibetan.win/wiki/Post:Five_Pragmatic_Slots_Site_Projects_To_Use_For_Any_Budget please click the next web page], Kasper are the most influential authors of the field of pragmatics.<br><br>What is Free Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics is more concerned with the contexts and language users rather than with truth or reference, or grammar. It focuses on the ways in which one expression can be interpreted as meaning different things from different contexts and also those caused by indexicality or ambiguity. It also focuses primarily on the strategies employed by listeners to determine whether phrases have a message. It is closely connected to the theory of conversative implicature which was developed by Paul Grice.<br><br>The boundaries between these two disciplines are a subject of debate. While the distinction is widely recognized, it's not always clear where they should be drawn. For instance philosophers have suggested that the concept of sentence's meaning is a part of semantics, while others have argued that this type of thing should be viewed as a pragmatic problem.<br><br>Another issue is whether pragmatics is a subfield of philosophy of languages or a branch of the study of the study of linguistics. Some researchers have suggested that pragmatics is an independent discipline and should be considered a part of linguistics, along with phonology. syntax, semantics, etc. Others, however, have claimed that the study of pragmatics should be viewed as part of the philosophy of language since it deals with the ways in which our beliefs about the meanings and functions of language influence our theories about how languages work.<br><br>There are a few major aspects of the study of pragmatics that have fueled many of the debates. For instance, some researchers have suggested that pragmatics isn't an academic discipline in and of itself since it examines the ways people interpret and use language without referring to any facts about what actually gets said. This kind of approach is referred to as far-side pragmatics. Other scholars, [https://lt.dananxun.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=499277 프라그마틱 슬롯] ([http://www.1v34.com/space-uid-528492.html on the main page]) however, have argued that the study should be considered a field in its own right because it examines the ways in which the meaning and use of language is dependent on cultural and social factors. This is called near-side pragmatics.<br><br>The pragmatics field also discusses the inferential nature of utterances and the role of primary pragmatic processes in determining what a speaker is saying in the sentence. These are the issues addressed in greater detail in the papers written by Recanati and  [https://lt.dananxun.cn/home.php?mod=space&uid=499128 프라그마틱 슬롯 무료체험] 사이트 ([https://telegra.ph/From-The-Web-The-20-Most-Amazing-Infographics-About-Pragmatic-Free-09-14 please click the next web page]) Bach. Both papers discuss the notions saturation and free enrichment in the context of a pragmatic. These are significant pragmatic processes that help shape the meaning of an utterance.<br><br>How is Free Pragmatics Different from Explanatory Pragmatics?<br><br>The study of pragmatics is how context affects linguistic meaning. It examines the way human language is used during social interactions and the relationship between the speaker and interpreter. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are known as pragmaticians.<br><br>Over the years, many different theories of pragmatism were developed. Some, such as Gricean pragmatics, concentrate on the communication intention of a speaker. Relevance Theory for instance is focused on the processes of understanding that occur when listeners interpret the meaning of utterances. Some approaches to pragmatics have been merged with other disciplines, like cognitive science and philosophy.<br><br>There are also a variety of opinions on the boundary between pragmatics and semantics. Morris is one philosopher who believes that semantics and pragmatism are two different topics. He argues that semantics is concerned with the relationship between signs and objects they may or may not represent, while pragmatics is concerned with the use of words in the context.<br><br>Other philosophers such as Bach and Harnish have claimed that pragmatism is a subfield within semantics. They differentiate between 'near-side and far-side' pragmatics. Near-side pragmatics concentrates on the words spoken, while far-side pragmatics is focused on the logical consequences of saying something. They claim that some of the 'pragmatics' in an utterance is already determined by semantics, while other 'pragmatics' are defined by the processes of inference.<br><br>The context is one of the most important aspects in pragmatics. This means that a single utterance may have different meanings depending on the context, such as indexicality or ambiguity. The structure of the conversation, the beliefs of the speaker and intentions, as well as expectations of the audience can also alter the meaning of a word.<br><br>Another aspect of pragmatics is that it is culturally specific. This is because different cultures have their own rules regarding what is acceptable to say in different situations. In some cultures, it's polite to make eye contact. In other cultures, it's considered rude.<br><br>There are many different views of pragmatics, and lots of research is conducted in the field. Some of the main areas of study are formal and computational pragmatics theoretic and experimental pragmatics; cross-linguistic and intercultural pragmatics; as well as pragmatics in the clinical and experimental sense.<br><br>How does free Pragmatics compare to explanation Pragmatics?<br><br>The discipline of pragmatics is concerned with the way meaning is communicated by the language in a context. It focuses less on the grammatical structure that is used in the spoken word and more on what the speaker is actually saying. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are referred to as pragmaticians. The subject of pragmatics has a connection to other areas of the study of linguistics, such as syntax and semantics, or the philosophy of language.<br><br>In recent years, the field of pragmatics developed in many different directions. This includes computational linguistics as well as conversational pragmatics. These areas are characterized by a wide variety of research, which addresses aspects like lexical features and the interplay between language, discourse, and meaning.<br><br>One of the most important issues in the philosophical discussion of pragmatics is whether or not it is possible to have a rigorous, systematic account of the pragmatics/semantics interface. Some philosophers have suggested that it isn't (e.g. Morris 1938, Kaplan 1989). Other philosophers have suggested that the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is ill-defined and that pragmatics and semantics are in fact the identical.<br><br>The debate over these positions is usually an ongoing debate and scholars arguing that certain instances fall under the umbrella of either semantics or pragmatics. Some scholars believe that if a statement carries a literal truth conditional meaning, it is semantics. Others believe that the fact that a statement could be read differently is a sign of pragmatics.<br><br>Other researchers in pragmatics have taken a different approach and argue that the truth-conditional meaning a utterance has is only one among many ways that the expression can be understood, and that all of these ways are valid. This is sometimes referred to as "far-side pragmatics".<br><br>Recent work in pragmatics has attempted to combine semantic and far-side approaches, attempting to capture the full range of interpretive possibilities for an utterance by modeling how a speaker's intentions and beliefs affect the interpretation. For example, Champollion et al. (2019) combine the Gricean game theory model of the Rational Speech Act framework with technological advances from Franke and Bergen (2020). This model predicts listeners will entertain many possible exhausted parses of a utterance that contains the universal FCI Any, and that is why the exclusiveness implicature is so strong when compared to other plausible implications.

Revision as of 07:35, 19 December 2024

What is Pragmatics?

Pragmatics is the study of the connection between context, language and meaning. It asks questions like: What do people really think when they use words?

It's a philosophy of practical and reasonable actions. It's in opposition to idealism, which is the belief that you must always abide by your principles.

What is Pragmatics?

Pragmatics is the study of the ways in which language users gain meaning from and each with each other. It is often thought of as a part or language, however it differs from semantics in that it concentrates on what the user is trying to convey and not on what the actual meaning is.

As a research field, pragmatics is relatively young and its research has grown rapidly in the last few decades. It is a linguistics-related academic field however, it has also influenced research in other areas like sociolinguistics, psychology and Anthropology.

There are many different perspectives on pragmatics, which have contributed to its development and growth. One is the Gricean pragmatics approach, which is based primarily on the notions of intention and their interaction with the speaker's knowledge of the listener's comprehension. The lexical and concept perspectives on pragmatics are likewise perspectives on the subject. These perspectives have contributed to the wide range of subjects that researchers studying pragmatics have studied.

The research in pragmatics has been focused on a variety of topics, including L2 pragmatic comprehension, production of requests by EFL learners and the role of theory of mind in physical and mental metaphors. It is also applied to social and cultural phenomena, including political discourse, discriminatory language and interpersonal communication. Pragmatics researchers have also used diverse methodologies that range from experimental to sociocultural.

Figure 9A-C illustrates that the size of the knowledge base on pragmatics is different depending on the database used. The US and 슬롯 [please click the next web page] UK are two of the top producers in pragmatics research. However, their ranking differs based on the database. This difference is due to the fact that pragmatics is a multidisciplinary field that intersects with other disciplines.

This makes it difficult to rank the top authors in pragmatics according to the number of publications they have. It is possible to determine influential authors by looking at their contributions to the field of pragmatics. For example Bambini's contribution in pragmatics includes pioneering concepts such as conversational implicature, and politeness theory. Grice, Saul, and 프라그마틱 공식홈페이지, please click the next web page, Kasper are the most influential authors of the field of pragmatics.

What is Free Pragmatics?

The study of pragmatics is more concerned with the contexts and language users rather than with truth or reference, or grammar. It focuses on the ways in which one expression can be interpreted as meaning different things from different contexts and also those caused by indexicality or ambiguity. It also focuses primarily on the strategies employed by listeners to determine whether phrases have a message. It is closely connected to the theory of conversative implicature which was developed by Paul Grice.

The boundaries between these two disciplines are a subject of debate. While the distinction is widely recognized, it's not always clear where they should be drawn. For instance philosophers have suggested that the concept of sentence's meaning is a part of semantics, while others have argued that this type of thing should be viewed as a pragmatic problem.

Another issue is whether pragmatics is a subfield of philosophy of languages or a branch of the study of the study of linguistics. Some researchers have suggested that pragmatics is an independent discipline and should be considered a part of linguistics, along with phonology. syntax, semantics, etc. Others, however, have claimed that the study of pragmatics should be viewed as part of the philosophy of language since it deals with the ways in which our beliefs about the meanings and functions of language influence our theories about how languages work.

There are a few major aspects of the study of pragmatics that have fueled many of the debates. For instance, some researchers have suggested that pragmatics isn't an academic discipline in and of itself since it examines the ways people interpret and use language without referring to any facts about what actually gets said. This kind of approach is referred to as far-side pragmatics. Other scholars, 프라그마틱 슬롯 (on the main page) however, have argued that the study should be considered a field in its own right because it examines the ways in which the meaning and use of language is dependent on cultural and social factors. This is called near-side pragmatics.

The pragmatics field also discusses the inferential nature of utterances and the role of primary pragmatic processes in determining what a speaker is saying in the sentence. These are the issues addressed in greater detail in the papers written by Recanati and 프라그마틱 슬롯 무료체험 사이트 (please click the next web page) Bach. Both papers discuss the notions saturation and free enrichment in the context of a pragmatic. These are significant pragmatic processes that help shape the meaning of an utterance.

How is Free Pragmatics Different from Explanatory Pragmatics?

The study of pragmatics is how context affects linguistic meaning. It examines the way human language is used during social interactions and the relationship between the speaker and interpreter. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are known as pragmaticians.

Over the years, many different theories of pragmatism were developed. Some, such as Gricean pragmatics, concentrate on the communication intention of a speaker. Relevance Theory for instance is focused on the processes of understanding that occur when listeners interpret the meaning of utterances. Some approaches to pragmatics have been merged with other disciplines, like cognitive science and philosophy.

There are also a variety of opinions on the boundary between pragmatics and semantics. Morris is one philosopher who believes that semantics and pragmatism are two different topics. He argues that semantics is concerned with the relationship between signs and objects they may or may not represent, while pragmatics is concerned with the use of words in the context.

Other philosophers such as Bach and Harnish have claimed that pragmatism is a subfield within semantics. They differentiate between 'near-side and far-side' pragmatics. Near-side pragmatics concentrates on the words spoken, while far-side pragmatics is focused on the logical consequences of saying something. They claim that some of the 'pragmatics' in an utterance is already determined by semantics, while other 'pragmatics' are defined by the processes of inference.

The context is one of the most important aspects in pragmatics. This means that a single utterance may have different meanings depending on the context, such as indexicality or ambiguity. The structure of the conversation, the beliefs of the speaker and intentions, as well as expectations of the audience can also alter the meaning of a word.

Another aspect of pragmatics is that it is culturally specific. This is because different cultures have their own rules regarding what is acceptable to say in different situations. In some cultures, it's polite to make eye contact. In other cultures, it's considered rude.

There are many different views of pragmatics, and lots of research is conducted in the field. Some of the main areas of study are formal and computational pragmatics theoretic and experimental pragmatics; cross-linguistic and intercultural pragmatics; as well as pragmatics in the clinical and experimental sense.

How does free Pragmatics compare to explanation Pragmatics?

The discipline of pragmatics is concerned with the way meaning is communicated by the language in a context. It focuses less on the grammatical structure that is used in the spoken word and more on what the speaker is actually saying. Linguists who specialize in pragmatics are referred to as pragmaticians. The subject of pragmatics has a connection to other areas of the study of linguistics, such as syntax and semantics, or the philosophy of language.

In recent years, the field of pragmatics developed in many different directions. This includes computational linguistics as well as conversational pragmatics. These areas are characterized by a wide variety of research, which addresses aspects like lexical features and the interplay between language, discourse, and meaning.

One of the most important issues in the philosophical discussion of pragmatics is whether or not it is possible to have a rigorous, systematic account of the pragmatics/semantics interface. Some philosophers have suggested that it isn't (e.g. Morris 1938, Kaplan 1989). Other philosophers have suggested that the distinction between semantics and pragmatics is ill-defined and that pragmatics and semantics are in fact the identical.

The debate over these positions is usually an ongoing debate and scholars arguing that certain instances fall under the umbrella of either semantics or pragmatics. Some scholars believe that if a statement carries a literal truth conditional meaning, it is semantics. Others believe that the fact that a statement could be read differently is a sign of pragmatics.

Other researchers in pragmatics have taken a different approach and argue that the truth-conditional meaning a utterance has is only one among many ways that the expression can be understood, and that all of these ways are valid. This is sometimes referred to as "far-side pragmatics".

Recent work in pragmatics has attempted to combine semantic and far-side approaches, attempting to capture the full range of interpretive possibilities for an utterance by modeling how a speaker's intentions and beliefs affect the interpretation. For example, Champollion et al. (2019) combine the Gricean game theory model of the Rational Speech Act framework with technological advances from Franke and Bergen (2020). This model predicts listeners will entertain many possible exhausted parses of a utterance that contains the universal FCI Any, and that is why the exclusiveness implicature is so strong when compared to other plausible implications.