Texas asbestos attorneys lawsuit - fakenews.win, History
Many companies have gone bankrupt because of the asbestos lawsuits filed by the victims. A mesothelioma attorney can help you get compensation.
Health experts and doctors have long warned about the dangers of asbestos exposure. Industry leaders have minimized these risks. As time passed, asbestos lawyers-related illnesses became more common.
The Third Case
asbestos attorneys-related lawsuits started to gain momentum in 1970s, after studies in science began to connect asbestos with serious diseases like mesothelioma or asbestosis. Tens of thousands of lawsuits were filed because asbestos-related diseases rarely manifest for years after exposure. These lawsuits were filed in Texas because of its favorable laws.
Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s & 1950s of asbestos products. This case had a major impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s, it was revealed that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, placed profits over the safety and health of his employees. The testimony of a deposition revealed that Brown was heavily influenced by his company's chief medical advisor Dr. Russell Budd. Budd, a doctor famous for his indifference for employees' health was a well-known persona.
The evidence showed that Johns Manville knew about the dangers of asbestos and took no action to protect its workers. The court determined that the company was liable for the injuries suffered by workers who later developed mesothelioma or other asbestos-related illnesses. The court also ruled that the company was liable for damages for the families of employees who died.
After the decision in Borel many asbestos victims and families sought compensation from the companies that made use of asbestos as a material. The majority of the claims were denied for a variety reasons. A few cases were allowed to proceed and the courts came up with up a set of guidelines that guide the handling of asbestos-related lawsuits.
In the 1990s asbestos defendants were seeking legal rulings to reduce their liability. For example, they wanted to be able to argue that asbestos materials were not part of their product and therefore could not be held responsible for injuries sustained by people who worked with asbestos. The claims were not successful, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to accept the "asbestos lawyers product" defense.
Federal and state laws protect the right of a mesothelioma patient to seek compensation for their condition from the responsible parties in a specific case. However insurance companies continue combat these claims with a hammer and a sledgehammer.